History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Hamilton
225 Conn. 910
Conn.
1993
Check Treatment

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 30 Conn. App. 68 (AC 10692), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court improperly commingle direct appeal and collateral review standards and thereby arrive at the erroneous and harmful legal conclusion that in order to prevail on a direct appeal claim that the trial court erred in denying the defendant’s motion for a continuance to obtain new counsel, the defendant must demonstrate ‘specific prejudice’ or claim ‘ineffective assistance of counsel’?”

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Hamilton
Court Name: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Date Published: Feb 24, 1993
Citation: 225 Conn. 910
Docket Number: SC 14704
Court Abbreviation: Conn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.