History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Hallowell
91 Ind. 376
Ind.
1883
Check Treatment
Hammond, J.

— This is an appeal by the State in a criminal case, upon questions reserved, upon the refusal of the court below to give to the jury certain instructions which were tendered by the prosecuting attorney. If there was any record made of the trial, the verdict of the jury, or the judgment of the court, it is not embraced in the transcript. Sec. 1883, E. S. 1881, relating to appeals in such cases, is as follows : “ In case of an appeal from a question reserved on the part of the State, it shall not be necessary for the clerk of the court below to certify, in the transcript, any part of the proceedings and record except the bill of exceptions and the judgment of acquittal. When the question reserved is defectively stated, the Supreme Court may direct any part of the proceedings and record to be certified to them.”

As the record does not contain the verdict and judgment of acquittal, the appeal presents no question for the consideration of this court. It might be inferred from the last part of the section above quoted, that this court should, of its own motion, direct the clerk of the court below to certify to us the record of the verdict and judgment. The writ of certiorari can issue only upon motion, supported by affidavit, showing a diminution of the record. We do not judicially know but that the clerk has certified all the record that was made in the case.

The appeal is not sustained.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Hallowell
Court Name: Indiana Supreme Court
Date Published: Nov 22, 1883
Citation: 91 Ind. 376
Docket Number: No. 11,230
Court Abbreviation: Ind.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.