State v. HallinState v. Hallin
- Reporters:
- , ,
- Before:
- Joseph
On August 15, 1978, a judgment was entered on lеfendant’s conviction оn a charge of felоny hit and un. He was sentencеd to five years; execution of the entencе was suspended and he wаs placed on prоba-ion. On January 15, 1979, an ordеr was entered reeking рrobation and directing еxecution of the senence previously imposed. On January 23, 1979, the ourt entered an “ORDER VACATING SENTENCE ’REVIOUSLY IMPOSED AND GRANTING NEW ’ROBATION,” which read in material part:
“[T]he sentence previously imposed herein under date of Sеptember 15, 1978, and ordered executed by order of this court under date of Jаnuary 15,1979, be and the same is hereby vacated.
“It is adjudged that imposition of sentence is suspended and dеfendant placed оn probation ***.”
On May 1, 1979, an оrder was entered revoking proba-on, imposing a five-year sentence and ordering execution of the sentence. The defendant urged upon thе dal court that a new pre-sentence investigation was squired under
Although the record is perfectly clear that the trial idge did not intend on January 23 to go beyond íerely reinstating defеndant’s probation, the order hich he signed vacаted the 1978 sentence. The order hich the judge signed is сontrolling
(State v. Swain-Goldsmith,
267 Or 527, 517 P2d 684 (1974)), and when the May оrder was made the cоurt was acting as a sentеncing court” within the meaning of
Reversed and remanded for resentencing.