170 Mo. 429 | Mo. | 1902
One negro killed a negress, one Rosie Higgins, by stabbing her to death with a knife; and being tried therefor was found guilty of murder in the first degree, and sentence and judgment went accordingly. Higgins was a girl about twenty years of age, in stature five feet high and weighed about one hundred and ten pounds.
Defendant and deceased had lived together previous to this time, but fully four months before the homicide the Higgins girl had tired of defendant and she had taken up with another negro man and would have nothing to do with defendant, though she had nó ill will against him. Defendant went to see "the Hig
The evidence shows that on the afternoon of May 1, 1901, they met on Locust street in St. Louis, near the levee, the deceased with a girl friend of hers and was not expecting to see defendant. Defendant called Eosie Higgins a few feet away from her companion and for about five minutes engaged in an earnest conversation with her. The only part of the conversation detailed in evidence was, the girl said, “No, I won’t do it.” As soon as she uttered this statement, defendant struck her two vicious blows about the shoulders and neck with a pocket knife. The girl had turned to leave him and the blows were struck from behind; the assaulted woman in terror rushed across the street and into a restaurant, defendant following her and in the eating-house he again stabbed her, once the knife struck the neck, passed through into the cavity, severed an artery and the poor woman bled to death in a few minutes.
Defendant made a run for liberty. . He found a hiding place in the hull of a steamer lying at the wharf in St. Louis on which he had a brother at work. He remained in this hiding until the boat had left St. Louis for the South and when the boat was opposite Osceola, Arkansas, defendant leaped overboard and attempted to swim ashore. He was arrested and placed in jail at Osceola and detained there until the Missouri authorities could reach there to bring him back to this State.
His own testimony was the only evidence introduced in his behalf. That was unreasonable in most parts and contradicted the facts as testified to by numerous witnesses for the State and even under that evidence, if believed, he was guilty. He said deceased first struck at him with a pocket knife and as she ran across the street threw it away and that he picked the
There was abundant evidence to support the verdict, and the testimony of defendant was too improbable for rational belief. Neither courts nor juries are required to believe nonsense merely because it is sworn to.
Besides, the court gave instructions fully on the two points of murder in the first degree and self-defense, such as have frequently received our sanction, and these were all that should have been given, and instructions as to murder in the second degree and manslaughter were properly refused.
Consequently we affirm the judgment and direct that the sentence pronounced by the law be executed.
