State v. Gunberg

Aug 2, 1976
No. C 74-12-3854 Cr, CA 6094
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Fort
PER CURIAM.

Counsel have stipulated:

“It appearing to counsel ‍‌‌​​​​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​‌​​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌​‌‍for appellant and respondent herein that defendant-appellant’s sentence as a dangerous offender is erroneous, ‍‌‌​​​​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​‌​​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌​‌‍in that the judgment order herein imposes an additional sentence for being a dangerous ‍‌‌​​​​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​‌​​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌​‌‍offender, instead of enhancing the sentence for the underlying offenses:
“IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED ‍‌‌​​​​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​‌​​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌​‌‍between counsel for appellant and respondent that the judgment herein should be vacated and ‍‌‌​​​​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​‌​​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌​‌‍the cause remanded for resentencing.”

Reversed and remanded.