History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Grossmick
379 A.2d 453
| N.J. | 1977
|
Check Treatment
75 N.J. 48 (1977)
379 A.2d 453

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
WALTER GROSSMICK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued October 17, 1977.
Decided November 2, 1977.

Mr. Ronald Nelinson, Designated Counsel, argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Stanley C. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney).

Mr. Steven M. Ingis, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of the Appellate Division, 153 N.J. Super. 190.

For affirmance — Chief Justice HUGHES and Justices MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, CLIFFORD and SCHREIBER — 6.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Grossmick
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Nov 2, 1977
Citation: 379 A.2d 453
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.