66 N.J.L. 686 | N.J. | 1901
The record before us in this case discloses a certiorari out of the Supreme Court, directed to the Camden County Quarter ■ Sessions, and returned with a judgment against plaintiff in error and a motion to quash the indictment made in the Supreme Court.
The action of the Supreme Court upon the motion is thus indicated in the printed case, “Judgment in favor of the validity of the indictment.”
No final judgment being disclosed, there is nothing for us to review and the writ must be dismissed. Parles v. State, 33 Vroom 664.
For dismissal — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Dixon, Gummere, Collins, Fort, Hendrickson, Bogert, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees, Vroom. 12.