State v. . Graham

Jun 5, 1876
Reporters:
Before:
Bynum (per curiam)

The question raised here has been ‍​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​​​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌​​​​​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌​‌‌​​​​‌​​​‌​​​​​​​​‌​‌‌‌​​‍settled at the present term of this Court, S. v. Watson, ante, 136. ‍​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​​​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌​​​​​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌​‌‌​​​​‌​​​‌​​​​​​​​‌​‌‌‌​​‍It is there held that a partial exchange of circuits between two judges, ‍​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​​​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌​​​​​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌​‌‌​​​​‌​​​‌​​​​​​​​‌​‌‌‌​​‍with the aproval [approval] of the Governor, as here, is legal. Judge Schenck, ‍​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​​​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌​​​​​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌​‌‌​​​​‌​​​‌​​​​​​​​‌​‌‌‌​​‍therefore, had jurisdiction and the right to pronounce sentence upon the defendant.

PER ‍​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​​​‌​‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌​​​​​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌‌​‌‌​​​​‌​​​‌​​​​​​​​‌​‌‌‌​​‍CURIAM. Affirmed.

Cited: S. v. Graham, 76 N.C. 196.