History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Gosnell
204 S.E.2d 391
S.C.
1974
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

This appeal from appellant’s conviction of the offense of discharging a firearm into a dwelling in violation of Section 16-142, Code of 1962, is upon a single exception, %. e., “That the trial judge abused his discretion in refusing trial counsel’s motion for continuance.” The oral motion was made upon the ground of the absence of a witness. No attempt was made to comply with either the letter or spirit of Rule 27 of the Rules of the Circuit Court. Manifestly, since no showing was made which would have justified the exercise of the trial judge’s discretion in favor of granting the motion, no abuse of discretion in its refusal appears.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Gosnell
Court Name: Supreme Court of South Carolina
Date Published: Apr 10, 1974
Citation: 204 S.E.2d 391
Docket Number: 19806
Court Abbreviation: S.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.