midpage

State v. GoodmanState v. Goodman

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Mar 28, 2003
174A02
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Per Curiam
PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated ‍​‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​​​​​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌​​​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‌​‌‍in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the ‍​‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​​​​​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌​​​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‌​‌‍Court of Appeals is reversed. We hold that ‍​‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​​​​​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌​​​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‌​‌‍defendant’s petition for discretionary review as to additional ‍​‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​​​​​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌​​​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‌​‌‍issues was improvidently allowed.

REVERSED IN PART; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW ‍​‌​‌​‌‌​​‌​​​​​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌​​​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‌​‌‍IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED IN PART.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Goodman
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Mar 28, 2003
Citations: 357 N.C. 43; 577 S.E.2d 619; 2003 N.C. LEXIS 315; 174A02
Docket Number: 174A02
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
Log In