History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Gonsor
269 N.W. 568
S.D.
1936
Check Treatment
PEiR 'CURIAM.

The defendant was -convicted under an information containing two counts: First, -driving while intoxicated; second, failing to stop- the automobile which he was driving after injuring a person. The only -question presented on this appeal is whether a new trial should be granted upon the grounds of newly discovered evidence. We have carefully considered the entire record and especially the affidavits submitted in support of a motion for a new trial. W1e are- of the opinion that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to- grant the motion.

The judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.

All the Judges concur.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Gonsor
Court Name: South Dakota Supreme Court
Date Published: Nov 16, 1936
Citation: 269 N.W. 568
Docket Number: File No. 7913
Court Abbreviation: S.D.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.