History
  • No items yet
midpage
2016 Ohio 2693
Ohio Ct. App.
2016

STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, - vs - RICHARD W. GIBBS, Defendant-Appellant.

CASE NO. 2016-G-0059

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT GEAUGA COUNTY, OHIO

2016-Ohio-2693

[Cite as State v. Gibbs, 2016-Ohio-2693.]

CYNTHIA WESTCOTT RICE, P.J.

Criminal appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 06 C 000077. Judgment: Appeal dismissed.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

James R. Flaiz, Geauga County Prosecutor, and Nicholas A. Burling, Assistant Prosecutor, Courthouse Annex, 231 Main Street, Suite 3A, Chardon, OH 44024 (For Plaintiff-Appellee).

Richard W. Gibbs, pro se, PID: A530-087, London Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 69, 1580 State Route 56, SW, London, OH 43140 (Defendant-Appellant).

CYNTHIA WESTCOTT RICE, P.J.

{¶1} On February 11, 2016, appellant, Richard W. Gibbs filed a notice of appeal indicating that he was appealing a January 28, 2015 trial court entry.

{¶2} On February 16, 2016, appellee, the state of Ohio, filed a motion to dismiss the appeal pursuant to App.R. 4(A)(1) as being untimely by almost a year. On February 26, 2016, appellant responded to the motion to dismiss asserting that he was not appealing the January 28, 2015, as he stated on his notice of appeal, but that he was appealing “the trial court‘s failure to make a ruling on his January 19, 2016, motion to vacate a void conviction * * *.”

{¶3} Assuming that appellant is appealing the trial court‘s January 28, 2015 judgment entry as stated on his notice of appeal, appellee is correct that it is untimely by almost a year. In addition, there is already an appeal from the January 28, 2015 entry presently before this court in 11th Dist. Geauga No. 2015-G-0011, which would make this a duplicate appeal.

{¶4} As to appellant‘s assertion that he is actually appealing the trial court‘s failure to rule on his January 19, 2016 motion, there is no new judgment from which appellant could file a notice of appeal. A final judgment is a necessary condition for invoking this court‘s jurisdiction.

{¶5} Based upon the foregoing analysis, it is ordered that appellee‘s motion to dismiss is granted, and this appeal is hereby dismissed as being untimely and as being a duplicate appeal.

{¶6} Appeal dismissed.

TIMOTHY P. CANNON, J.,

COLLEEN MARY O‘TOOLE, J.,

concur.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Gibbs
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 25, 2016
Citations: 2016 Ohio 2693; 2016-G-0059
Docket Number: 2016-G-0059
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In
    State v. Gibbs, 2016 Ohio 2693