History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Garretson
91 Ohio St. 3d 1267
Ohio
2001
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed because the issue is now moot.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents.





Dissenting Opinion

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

dissenting. I respectfully dissent from the majority’s decision to dismiss the cause as moot. Rather, I would find that pursuant to R.C. 2949.05, the trial court had jurisdiction to execute its sentence. Therefore, I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and reinstate the judgment of the trial court.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Garretson
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: May 23, 2001
Citation: 91 Ohio St. 3d 1267
Docket Number: No. 00-1462
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.