History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Francum
12 N.C. App. 37
N.C. Ct. App.
1971
Check Treatment
VAUGHN, Judge.

Defendant’s court-appointed counsel has made no assignments of error and states that the case is brought forward to seek such relief as the Court might find the appellant entitled. The purported appeal is from a judgment denying defendant relief under a paper writing which he labeled a “writ of habeas corpus” and which was treated as such by the able trial judge. Except in cases' involving the custody of minor children, an appeal does not lie from a judgment on return to a writ of habeas corpus. In re Wright, 8 N.C. App. 330, 174 S.E. 2d 27.

Appeal dismissed.

Judges Brock and Graham concur.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Francum
Court Name: Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Date Published: Jul 14, 1971
Citation: 12 N.C. App. 37
Docket Number: No. 7128SC452
Court Abbreviation: N.C. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.