History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Foster
505 So. 2d 658
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1987
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order discharging defendant on speedy trial grounds. Defendant was not brought to trial within ten days after the hearing on his motion for discharge. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.191(i)(4). The state did not timely raise with the trial court, as it was the state’s burden to do, its argument that the hearing had been timely held and that the trial judge should have scheduled the trial within ten days thereafter. See Apolinari v. Ulmer, 483 So.2d 75, 77 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).

LEHAN, A.C.J., and HALL and SANDERLIN, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Foster
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Apr 15, 1987
Citation: 505 So. 2d 658
Docket Number: No. 85-2717
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.