State v. Forrest, 952 S.W.2d 344

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

John Forrest appeals the judgment and sentences entered upon his convictions by a juiy of two counts of second degree robbery, section 569.030 RSMo 1994.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential or jurisprudential value. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

In this consolidated matter, Forrest also appeals from the denial of his 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. The motion court’s findings of fact are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. The motion court’s judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Forrest

Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals

Date Published: Sep 16, 1997

Citations: 952 S.W.2d 344; 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1621; 1997 WL 570671; Nos. 69238, 71464

Docket Number: Nos. 69238, 71464

Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.