65 Iowa 452 | Iowa | 1884
II. There are two or three questions which are not common to both cases, which we briefly consider. It is claimed that the evidence does not show that Hollister relied upon the representations made by the defendant, but upon representations made by another person whom the defendant called upon to vouch for his (the defendant’s) financial standing and credit. As we read the record, this claim is not supported by the evidence. The jury were fully warranted in finding that the representations relied upon were made by the defendant.
IT. The defendant was sentenced to confinement in the penitentiary for three years. It is urged that the punishment is excessive. We see nothing in the record to justify us in interfering with the judgment on this ground.
Affirmed.