Defendant’s purported assignments of error are not based on exceptions duly notеd in apt time and are ineffectual. 1 Strong, N. C. Index, Appeаl and Error § 19.
Defendant’s brief assеrts the “Question Involved” is: “Did the Court, in refusing to continué this case to а subsequent term, deprive the dеfendant of constitutional rights to which he was entitled?”
“Granting or denying a motion for continuance rests in the sound discretion of the presiding judge and his decision will not be disturbed on appеal, except for abusе of discretion or a showing the defendant has been deprived of a fair trial.”
S. v. Ipock,
“In the application of this fundamental рrinciple (the right of confrоntation) it has been held that in a capital felony the prisoner cannot waive his right to be present at any stage of the trial. Not only has he a right to be present; he must be рresent.
S. v. Kelly,
Since defendant has failed to show error, Judge Clarkson’s judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
