State v. FanningState v. Fanning
- Reporters:
- Before:
- Holmes
delivered the opinion of the court.
The indictment charged the defendant with “ unlawfully selling a large quantity of intoxicating liquors, to-wit, one pint of whiskey, without then and there having a dram-shop licence, or any other legal authority.” Tins indictment does not even pursue the language of the statute. The gravamen of the offence consists in selling intoxicating liquors in a less *410quantity than one gallon. It may be true that he sold a pint, but as a part of the larger quantity alleged to have been sold. This is a greater laxity in pleading than can be allowed. The exact quantity is immaterial, provided it be a less quantity than one gallon; but this fact should be distinctly averred, as well as the quantity sold.
Judgment reversed.
Judge Wagner concurs; Judge Lovelace absent.