History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Esperti
238 So. 2d 312
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1970
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

The petitioner files this timely petition for writ of certiorari to review an order of the trial court requiring the petitioner to disclose for an in camera inspection all evidence favorable to the respondent.

Respondent argues that common law certiorari is not the appropriate vehicle to review the order of the trial court. This contention was specifically rejected by this court in State v. Gillespie, Fla.App.1969, 227 So.2d 550.

The record before the court conclusively shows that the respondent has satisfied the dictates of this court’s announced prerequisite for the entry of the order here reviewed. State v. Williams, Fla.App.1969, 227 So.2d 253, and State v. Gillespie, supra.

Inasmuch as the respondent has laid the predicate required for the entry of an order compelling disclosure of all evidence favorable to him for an in camera inspection by the trial court, the petition for writ of certi-orari is

Denied.

HOBSON, C. J., and LILES and PIERCE, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Esperti
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Aug 5, 1970
Citation: 238 So. 2d 312
Docket Number: No. 69-689
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.