State v. Elwood

Aug 24, 1983
8210 2424; CA A27236
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Gillette
PER CURIAM

Defendant pleaded guilty to two counts of criminal mischief. He assigns error to the trial court’s subsequent ‍​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​​​‌​​‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​​​​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​​​​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​​‌‌​‍refusal to permit him to withdraw his guilty pleas. This court has no authority to consider defendant’s contentions in this regard on direct appeal. ORS 138.050; State v. Clevenger, 64 Or App 183, 667 P2d 9 (1983); see also State v. ‍​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​​​‌​​‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​​​​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​​​​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​​‌‌​‍Lugo, 48 Or App 919, 618 P2d 986 (1980); State v. Slopak, 3 Or App 532, 475 P2d 421 (1970); but see State v. Cornelius, 249 Or 454, 438 P2d 1020 (1968). Defendant’s remedy, if any, lies in post-conviction relief.

Defendant contends, in the alternative, that the ‍​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​​​‌​​‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​​​​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​​​​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​​‌‌​‍trial court erred in imposing requirements of restitution and repayment of the cost of court-appointed counsel, without determining defendant’s present or future ability to pay. The state concedes that the record in this case ‍​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​​​‌​​‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​​​​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​​​​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​​‌‌​‍is not adequate to support a finding that defendant is or will be able to pay restitution and costs. ORS 137.106(2)(a)(b); ORS 161.665(2); see State v. Smith, 60 Or App 139, 652 P2d 882 (1982).

The part of the judgment imposing on ‍​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​​​‌​​‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​​​​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​​​​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​​‌‌​‍defendant the obligation to pay restitution and attorney fees is vacated, and the case is remanded for resentencing.