History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Edsall
26 Ohio St. 2d 145
Ohio
1971
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Habeas corpus tests only the jurisdiction of the sentencing court. In this ease, the J\ivenile *146Court had jurisdiction of the subject matter and the person of appellant. Accordingly, its original order of commitment, as well as its subsequent order of July 9, 1970, committing appellant to the detention home for 30 days, were valid and lawful orders by a court of competent jurisdiction. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is, therefore, affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

O’Neill, C. J., Schneider, Herbert, Duncan, Corrigan, Stern and Leach, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Edsall
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: May 19, 1971
Citation: 26 Ohio St. 2d 145
Docket Number: No. 70-594
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.