midpage

State v. EchemequeState v. Echemeque

District Court of Appeal of Florida
Mar 17, 1987
No. 86-2354
Versions:503 So. 2d 996
12 Fla. L. Weekly 776
1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12073
PER CURIAM.

We relinquished jurisdiction to the trial court for the purpose of allowing it to enter a written statement explaining its reasons for departing below the sentencing guidelines in sentencing the defendant. Our relinquishment having expired, and no written order having been entered, the defendant’s sentence is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court for resentencing. See State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985). We remind the trial court that Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(11) requires that “[a]ny sentence outside of the guidelines must be accompanied by a written statement delineating the reasons for the departure.” We trust that should the trial court upon resentencing again depart from the guidelines, it will comply with the requirements of this rule.

Reversed and remanded.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Echemeque
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Mar 17, 1987
Citations: 503 So. 2d 996; 12 Fla. L. Weekly 776; 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12073; No. 86-2354
Docket Number: No. 86-2354
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In