State v. Duvel

May 16, 1927
Versions:136 A. 924
103 N.J.L. 715
1927 N.J. LEXIS 267
Pee Clfriam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Parker, Black, Katzenbach, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfied, Dear, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.