State v. Durr, 77 Ohio St. 3d 444

Per Curiam.

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals denying appellant’s application for reopening. Appellant has failed to establish the existence of a colorable claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel under Strickland v. Washington (1984), 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674. We further reject appellant’s propositions of law raised before this court for the same reasons articulated by the court of appeals.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Durr

Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court

Date Published: Feb 19, 1997

Citations: 77 Ohio St. 3d 444; 674 N.E.2d 1379; No. 96-1581

Docket Number: No. 96-1581

Court Abbreviation: Ohio