State v. Dunsford, 634 So. 2d 319

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order dismissing the information. Under Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299, 52 S.Ct. 180, 76 L.Ed. 306 (1932), there was no double jeopardy violation.¹

REVERSE and REMAND for further proceedings.

ERVIN, MICKLE and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Notes

1 . We acknowledge that United States v. Dixon, 509 U.S.-, 113 S.Ct. 2849, 125 L.Ed.2d 556 (1993), which changed the law in this area, had not been issued at the time the trial court decided the case at bar and relied on the Court’s earlier contradictory decision in Grady v. Corbin, 495 U.S. 508, 110 S.Ct. 2084, 109 L.Ed.2d 548 (1990).

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Dunsford

Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida

Date Published: Apr 7, 1994

Citations: 634 So. 2d 319; 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3291; 1994 WL 113623; No. 92-2857

Docket Number: No. 92-2857

Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.