History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Dunkin
108 Or. App. 488
Or. Ct. App.
1991
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals her conviction for possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(4). We affirm her conviction without discussion and write only to address her assignment that the court imposed an improper condition of probation.

The trial court suspended imposition of sentence and placed defendant on two years probation. As a condition of probation, it ordered that she “[s]ubmit person, residence, vehicle, and property to search by probation officer.” We accept the state’s concession that the condition does not conform to ORS 137.540(2)(m), which requires that there be reasonable grounds to justify any search. The condition of probation must be vacated and the case remanded for resentencing. State v. Ward, 102 Or App 679, 680, 794 P2d 833 (1990); State v. Schwab, 95 Or App 593, 771 P2d 277 (1989).

Conviction affirmed; condition of probation allowing search by probation officer vacated; remanded for resentencing.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Dunkin
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Date Published: Aug 21, 1991
Citation: 108 Or. App. 488
Docket Number: 89C-21430; CA A64491
Court Abbreviation: Or. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.