History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Dugan
89 A. 1135
N.J.
1914
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Kalisch in the Supreme Court.

■ For affirmance — The Chancellor, Garrison, Swayze, Parker, Mintuen, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Congdon, White, Heppenhelmer, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Dugan
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Jan 29, 1914
Citation: 89 A. 1135
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.