State v. Dugan

Jan 29, 1914
Versions:89 A. 1135
56 Vroom 730
85 N.J.L. 730
1914 N.J. LEXIS 210
Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Kalisch in the Supreme Court.

■ For affirmance — The Chancellor, Garrison, Swayze, Parker, Mintuen, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Congdon, White, Heppenhelmer, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.