State v. Dugan
65 N.J.L. 684
N.J.1901Check TreatmentThe judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Yan Syckel in that court. Ante p. 65.
For affirmance—-Ti-ie Chancellor, Dixon, Collins, Fort, G-arretson, Bogert, Krueger, Hendrickson, Adams, Yredenburgi-i, Yoorhees. 11.
For reversal—Hone.