State v. Dugan

Mar 4, 1901
Versions:48 A. 1118
65 N.J.L. 684
36 Vroom 684
1901 N.J. LEXIS 161
Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Yan Syckel in that court. Ante p. 65.

For affirmance—-Ti-ie Chancellor, Dixon, Collins, Fort, G-arretson, Bogert, Krueger, Hendrickson, Adams, Yredenburgi-i, Yoorhees. 11.

For reversal—Hone.