State v. Dugan
65 N.J.L. 684 | N.J. | 1901
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Yan Syckel in that court. Ante p. 65.
For affirmance—-Ti-ie Chancellor, Dixon, Collins, Fort, G-arretson, Bogert, Krueger, Hendrickson, Adams, Yredenburgi-i, Yoorhees. 11.
For reversal—Hone.
