History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Dugan
65 N.J.L. 684
N.J.
1901
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Yan Syckel in that court. Ante p. 65.

For affirmance—-Ti-ie Chancellor, Dixon, Collins, Fort, G-arretson, Bogert, Krueger, Hendrickson, Adams, Yredenburgi-i, Yoorhees. 11.

For reversal—Hone.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Dugan
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Mar 4, 1901
Citation: 65 N.J.L. 684
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.