147 Iowa 645 | Iowa | 1910
X. In the course of his closing argument’to the jury, E. E. Sayles, who was assisting the county attorney, said:
To this statement of counsel defendant objected, as follows: “Defendant objects to the statement of counsel for the state that the jury would have a right to infer that if the defendant could have produced evidence of his good character that he would have done so in this case, as being improper and getting outside the record, and not properly a matter in reply to argument made by counsel for the
Because of error pointed out, thp judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.