History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Dow
246 N.C. 644
| N.C. | 1957
|
Check Treatment
99 S.E.2d 860 (1957)
246 N.C. 644

STATE
v.
Sam E. DOW.

No. 149.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 25, 1957.

*862 Steve Dolley, Jr., and Ernest R. Warren, Gastonia, for defendant appellant.

George B. Patton, Atty. Gen., and Claude L. Love, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Our Constitution provides: "No person shall be convicted of any crime but by the unanimous verdict of a jury of good and lawful persons in open court." Art. 1, sec. 13.

When requested in apt time, a party is entitled to have the jury polled; that is, an inquiry directed to each juror in order to ascertain his assent to the announced verdict. When so polled and the verdict is challenged, the record must affirmatively establish that each juror assented to the verdict entered. State v. Cephus, 241 N.C. 562, 86 S.E.2d 70; State v. Boger, 202 N.C. 702, 163 S.E. 877; Columbus Oil Co. v. Moore, 202 N.C. 708, 163 S.E. 879; Lipscomb v. Cox, 195 N.C. 502, 142 S.E. 779. The verdict now challenged does not, on the record, meet the test.

New trial.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Dow
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Sep 25, 1957
Citation: 246 N.C. 644
Docket Number: 149
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.