midpage

State v. DonneganState v. Donnegan

Supreme Court of Missouri
Mar 15, 1863
Reporters:
Before:
Bates
Bates, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The defendant was indicted for ‍‌​‌‌‌​​​‌​​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‌​​​​​​‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​​​‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​​​‌​​​‌‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​‍stealing a horse, mare, buggy and set of harness. Before the trial, the circuit attorney announced that he would not further prosecute ‍‌​‌‌‌​​​‌​​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‌​​​​​​‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​​​‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​​​‌​​​‌‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​‍the indictment against the defendant so far as the same relates to the charge of the larceny of the buggy and set ‍‌​‌‌‌​​​‌​​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‌​​​​​​‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​​​‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​​​‌​​​‌‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​‍pf harness.

We cannot see that there was any error in this prejudicial to the defendant. At the trial, evidence was given ‍‌​‌‌‌​​​‌​​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‌​​​​​​‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​​​‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​​​‌​​​‌‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​‍of the larceny of a gelding, and objection was made that it did not support the indictment for stealing a horse. There ‍‌​‌‌‌​​​‌​​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‌​​​​​​‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​​​‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​​‌‌​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​​​‌​​​‌‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​‍is no force in the objection.

Judgment affirmed.

Judges Bay and Dryden concur.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Donnegan
Court Name: Supreme Court of Missouri
Date Published: Mar 15, 1863
Citation: 34 Mo. 67
Court Abbreviation: Mo.
Log In