History
  • No items yet
midpage
558 So. 2d 1001
Fla.
1990
BARKETT, Justice.

We have for review Dixon v. State, 546 So.2d 1194 (Fla.3d DCA 1989) (on rehearing), which is in express and direct conflict with the Fifth District Court of Appeal’s decision of Franklin v. State, 526 So.2d 159 (Fla.5th DCA 1988), approved on other grounds, 545 So.2d 851 (Fla.1989). We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3) of the Florida Constitution.

The state raises only one issue for our review. That issue is identical to the one we decide today in State v. Watts, 558 So.2d 994 (Fla.1990). For the reasons we state in Watts, we approve the decision of the district court below.

It is so ordered.

EHRLICH, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, SHAW, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Dixon
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Mar 15, 1990
Citations: 558 So. 2d 1001; 15 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 149; 1990 Fla. LEXIS 385; 1990 WL 29522; No. 74608
Docket Number: No. 74608
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In
    State v. Dixon, 558 So. 2d 1001