History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. . Dixon
78 N.C. 558
N.C.
1878
Check Treatment

We find nothing in the conduct of the cause of which the appellant can rightfully complain. (559) The solicitor is not restricted to the first bill, but may at any time before entering upon the trial send another bill to the grand jury, and require the defendants to answer that. It is equally plain that where several persons are charged, whether they unite in a common defense, or as in this case where their defenses are separate and antagonistic, the court must regulate the order and manner in which the defenses are to be presented; and the exercise of this discretion cannot be reviewed in this Court. But as far as any rule of practice is to be found, it was observed in this case by calling on the defendant whose name first appeared on the bill, to begin his defense. This was done in Regina v.Barber, 1 Car. and Payne, 434, where the defendants' counsel were unable to agree among themselves.

PER CURIAM. No error.

Cited: S. v. Respass, 85 N.C. 536; S. v. Hastings, 86 N.C. 597; S.v. McNeill, 93 N.C. 555; S. v. Parish, 104 N.C. 689. *Page 377

(560)

Case Details

Case Name: State v. . Dixon
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Jan 5, 1878
Citation: 78 N.C. 558
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.