State v. DillonState v. Dillon
- Reporters:
- ,
- Before:
- Per Curiam
Appellant was originally charged with twelve counts of sexual contact with a minor,
Appellant contends that the maximum penalties on each of five counts are disproportionate to the offenses and violate the United States Constitution, eighth amendment, and the South Dakota Constitution, article VI, section 23.
*56 We have interpreted the United States Supreme Court decision in Solem v. Helm, — U.S. —, 103 S.Ct. 3001, 77 L.Ed.2d 637 (1983), as instructing us that “we must consider the proportionality of the sentence when a life sentence without parole is imposed.” (emphasis in original) State v. Williamson, 342 N.W.2d 15, 18 (S.D.1983). Because appellant’s consecutive five-year sentences were within the statutory limits and do not shock the conscience of the court, we will not review them on appeal. State v. Phipps, 318 N.W.2d 128 (S.D.1982); State v. Antelope, 304 N.W.2d 115 (S.D.1981).
The judgment of conviction and the sentences entered thereon are affirmed.
Notes
The maximum penalty at the time of appellant’s offenses, which all occurred prior to July 1, 1982, was five years imprisonment and/or a $5,000.00 fine.