State v. DiBenedetto

Nov 18, 1912
Versions:85 A. 1135
83 N.J.L. 792
1912 N.J. LEXIS 237
Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Gummere in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Garrison, Swayze, Trench ard, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisoh, Bogbrt, Yredenburgit, Congdon, White, Tkeacy, JJ. 12.

For reversal- — None.