History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Dennis
86 Ohio St. 3d 201
Ohio
1999
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals denying appellant’s application for reopening for the reasons articulated by the court of appeals. Appellant has offered no compelling justification why his application was filed beyond the time required in App.R. 26(B).

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Dennis
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Aug 11, 1999
Citation: 86 Ohio St. 3d 201
Docket Number: No. 99-101
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.