History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Demalignon
131 Or. App. 259
Or. Ct. App.
1994
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals the sentence imposed on his conviction for criminal mischief in the first degree. ORS 164.365. At trial, he objected to the imposition of restitution because the trial court failed to consider defendant’s ability to pay. He assigns error to the sentence of restitution. The state concedes that the trial court erred in imposing restitution, because it failed to consider defendant’s ability to pay. ORS 137.106(2)(b). We accept the concession and remand for resentencing.

Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Demalignon
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Date Published: Nov 2, 1994
Citation: 131 Or. App. 259
Docket Number: 93-1832-C-1; CA A81046
Court Abbreviation: Or. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.