is of the opinion the writ should not be considered. See reasons assigned, in State v. Normand, No. 51,049 on the docket of this Court, 257 La. 270, 242 So.2d 245.
TATE, J., concurs in BARHAM, J.’s reasons for not considering the application.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.
