189 Mo. App. 675 | Mo. Ct. App. | 1915
Defendant was convicted under-section 8315, Revised Statutes 1909, on tbe charge of' holding herself out as a physician, in that she was-
A full transcript of the proceedings, including all of the evidence, is on file here, but no briefs or arguments are presented for either party. However, in accordance with the statute enjoining the duty on the court to do so, we have read and considered all the evidence and. examined the entire record for error which may appear to be prejudicial to defendant. Suffice to say that in accordance with the construction placed upon the statute by the Supreme Court in State v. Smith, 233 Mo. 242, 135 S. W. 465, there is'an abundance of evidence tending to support the judgment of conviction.
On considering the information and the instructions, they seem to be sufficient and proper in every respect, and the court did not err in refusing the instructions requested by defendant.
No reversible error is discovered in the record and the judgment should, therefore, be affirmed. It is so ordered: