History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. David
26 Or. App. 359
Or. Ct. App.
1976
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Counsel have stipulated:

"It appearing to counsel for appellant and respondent herein that defendant-appellant’s sentence as a dangerous offender is erroneous, in that the judgment order herein imposes an additional sentence for being a dangerous offender, instead of enhancing the sentence for the underlying offense:
"IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between counsel for appellant and respondent that the judgment herein should be vacated and the cause remanded for resentencing.”

Reversed and remanded.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. David
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Date Published: Aug 2, 1976
Citation: 26 Or. App. 359
Docket Number: No. C 75-09-2796 Cr, CA 5628
Court Abbreviation: Or. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.