State v. David, 552 P.2d 272

PER CURIAM.

Counsel have stipulated:

“It appearing to counsel for appellant and respondent herein that defendant-appellant’s sentence as a dangerous offender is erroneous, in that the judgment order herein imposes an additional sentence for being a dangerous offender, instead of enhancing the sentence for the underlying offense:

“IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between counsel for appellant and respondent that the judgment herein should be vacated and the cause remanded for resentencing.”

Reversed and remanded.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. David

Court Name: Court of Appeals of Oregon

Date Published: Aug 2, 1976

Citations: 552 P.2d 272; 26 Or. App. 359; No. C 75-09-2796 Cr, CA 5628

Docket Number: No. C 75-09-2796 Cr, CA 5628

Court Abbreviation: Or. Ct. App.