83 So. 223 | La. | 1919
When defendant was first called for trial he sought and obtained a continuance on the ground of the absence of a material witness. When the case was called the second time for trial he asked for a continuance because of the absence of the same alleged material witness, who appeared to be a resident of the state of Texas.
Defendant has not made an appearance in this court.
The judgment appealed from is affirmed.