midpage

State v. DaigleState v. Daigle

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Dec 22, 1977
No. 61225
Versions:353 So. 2d 287
1977 La. LEXIS 5998

Lead Opinion

In re: Renee Y. Daigle applying for writ of certiorari and review. Evangeline Parish.

Writ refused. No error.






Concurrence Opinion

TATE, J.,

concurs: La.C.Cr.P. art. 230.1 (1977) requires an accused to be brought before the judge within 72 hours for purposes of appointment of counsel. An accused is entitled to be released forthwith until counsel is secured, if no appointment is made. Here the right to be released is moot, since counsel has been secured. The remedy for violation is exclusion of any statement secured when counsel should have been but was not afforded.






Dissenting Opinion

DIXON, J.,

would grant. The legislature has clearly provided that the sanction for the violation of 230.1 of C.Cr.P. is the immediate release of the defendant. This ruling ignores the plain words and clear intent of the statute.

CALOGERO, J., is of the view the writ should be granted. The law is unequivocal. DENNIS, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Daigle
Court Name: Supreme Court of Louisiana
Date Published: Dec 22, 1977
Citations: 353 So. 2d 287; 1977 La. LEXIS 5998; No. 61225
Docket Number: No. 61225
Court Abbreviation: La.
Log In