History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Crossen
115 N.H. 137
N.H.
1975
Check Treatment

Memorandum Opinion

Defendant was convicted in a jury trial in which he was represented by counsel of two counts of selling a controlled drug. Defendant’s exceptions were reserved and transferred by Cann, J-

A review of the transcript does not support the claim of the defendant that he did not receive a fair trial. The claim that newly discovered evidence warrants a new trial should be addressed to the superior court. RSA 491:7 (Supp. 1973); State v. Long, 90 N.H. 103, 107, 4 A.2d 865, 868 (1939).

Exceptions overruled.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Crossen
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Mar 31, 1975
Citation: 115 N.H. 137
Docket Number: No. 6984
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.