State v. Cortese

Dec 15, 1927
Versions:139 A. 923
104 N.J.L. 447
1927 N.J. LEXIS 336
Pee Cueiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance, — Trencitabd, Mintuen, Black, Katzenbach, Lloyd, Van Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Deae, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.