midpage

State v. CornelisonState v. Cornelison

Ohio Supreme Court
May 17, 2016
No. 2014-1402
Versions:

{¶ 1} In State v. Marcum, 146 Ohio St.3d 516, 2016-Ohio-1002, 59 N.E.3d 1231, we held that R.C. 2953.08(G)(2) allows an appellate court to increase, reduce, or otherwise modify a sentence only when it clearly and convincingly finds that the sentence is (1) contrary to law or (2) unsupported by the record. Id. at ¶ 7.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals in the instant case is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of Marcum.

O’Connor, C.J., and PfeifeR, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Cornelison
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: May 17, 2016
Citations: 2016 Ohio 2968; 146 Ohio St. 3d 220; 54 N.E.3d 1217; No. 2014-1402
Docket Number: No. 2014-1402
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
Log In