midpage

State v. CoppedgeState v. Coppedge

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 10, 1956
220
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Winborne
Winborne, C. J.

The statute, G.S. 49-2, declares that “any parent who willfully neglects or who refuses to support and maintain his or her illegitimate child shall be guilty of a misdemeanor ‍​‌​‌​​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌‍. . .”

The only prosecution contemplated under this statute is grounded on the willful neglect or refusal of a parent to support his or her illegitimate child, — the mere begetting of the child not being denominated a crime. S. v. Clarke, 220 N.C. 392, 17 S.E. 2d 468; S. v. Dill, 224 N.C. 57, 29 S.E. 2d 145; S. v. Stiles, 228 N.C. 137, 44 S.E. 2d 728; S. v. Bowser, 230 N.C. 330, 53 ‍​‌​‌​​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌‍S.E. 2d 282; S. v. Thompson, 233 N.C. 345, 64 S.E. 2d 157; S. v. Robinson, 236 N.C. 408, 72 S.E. 2d 857; S. v. Chambers, 238 N.C. 373, 78 S.E. 2d 209.

Likewise the failure of a father to pay the expenses of the mother incident to the birth of the illegitimate child is not a criminal offense. S. v. Thompson, supra.

In the Clarke case, supra, opinion by Devin, J., later C. J., this Court stated in respect ‍​‌​‌​​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌‍to the offense defined in G.S. 49-2: “Willfulness is one of the essential elements of the offense. This must be charged in the warrant . . . Its omission is not cured by C.S. 4623 (now G.S. 15-153),” citing cases.

In the light of the statute, as so interpreted by this Court, it appears upon the face of the record proper that the warrant fails ‍​‌​‌​​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌‍to allege the essential element of willfulness. This is a fatal defect in the warrant. Hence motion in arrest of judgment should be allowed. S. v. Clarke, supra. The Attorney-General so concedes.

Nevertheless, this statute G.S. 49-2, as interpreted by this Court, creates a continuing offense. S. v. Chambers, supra, citing S. v. Johnson, 212 N.C. 566, 194 S.E. 319; S. v. Bradshaw, 214 N.C. 5, 197 S.E. 564; S. v. Davis, 223 N.C. 54, 25 ‍​‌​‌​​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌‍S.E. 2d 164; S. v. Robinson, supra.

Hence the decision here will not preclude further prosecution in keeping with the existing factual situation. £. v. Perry, 241 N.C. 119, 84 S.E. 2d 329.

For reason stated

Judgment arrested.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Coppedge
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Oct 10, 1956
Citations: 244 N.C. 590; 94 S.E.2d 569; 1956 N.C. LEXIS 463; 220
Docket Number: 220
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
Log In