History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Conrad
21 Mo. 271
Mo.
1855
Check Treatment
Ryland, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The defendant, Conrad, was prosecuted before a justice of the peace for an assault and battery on Dorothea Conrad, was found guilty, and fined fifty dollars. He appealed to the St. Louis Criminal Court, where he made his motion to quash the eomplaint against him. His motion was overruled, and he was again tried and found guilty by a jury, who assessed his punishment at $100.

He brings the case to this court, and assigns for error the refusal of the Criminal Court to quash the complaint made in this case against him.

The judgment below is affirmed. This court will not reverse a judgment in a criminal case because the court below refused to quash the complaint or the indictment. The Criminal Court is not bound to quash an indictment or a complaint of this nature ; and this has been so often said, that really it seems that nothing is to be considered as settled, but every case must, come here and be tried again.

Let the judgment be affirmed : the other judges concurring..

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Conrad
Court Name: Supreme Court of Missouri
Date Published: Mar 15, 1855
Citation: 21 Mo. 271
Court Abbreviation: Mo.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.