History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Coney
46 Haw. 50
Haw.
1962
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The defendants-appellants and the plaintiff-appellee have filed separate petitions for rehearing in the above-entitled canse.

The contentions set forth in the respective petitions have been carefully examined and considered. The court finds that the points presented are not new, having been fully briefed and argued by counsel and considered by this court in its decision.

The petitions are therefore denied.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Coney
Court Name: Hawaii Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 26, 1962
Citation: 46 Haw. 50
Docket Number: No. 4197
Court Abbreviation: Haw.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.