History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Comer
95 Ohio St. 3d 1472
Ohio
2002
Check Treatment

Lucas App. No. L-99-1296, 2002-Ohio-233. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Decision and Judgment Entry dated February 21, 2002, at 4:

“When a trial court sentences an individual to non-minimum, consecutive or maximum sentences, must the trial court make the requisite findings from the bench at the sentencing hearing or is it sufficient to make the findings for the first time in the sentencing entry?”

F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents. Resnick, J., not participating.

The conflict case is State v. Williams (2000), 136 Ohio App.3d 570, 737 N.E.2d 139.

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2002-0422, State v. Comer, Lucas App. No. L-99-1296, 2002-Ohio-233.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Comer
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: May 29, 2002
Citation: 95 Ohio St. 3d 1472
Docket Number: 2002-0351
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.